Intra-Satellite Communications

Navy Phase I SBIR Topic: DON26BZ03-NV060
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)
Pre-release 6/3/26   Opens to accept proposals 6/24/26   Closes 7/22/26 12:00pm ET    [ View TPOC Information ]

DON26BZ03-NV060 TITLE: Intra-Satellite Communications

OUSW (R&E) CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Quantum and Battlefield Information Dominance (Q-BID)

COMPONENT TECHNOLOGY PRIORITY AREA(S): Space Technology

PROJECTED CMMC LEVEL REQUIREMENT: Level 2 (Self)

The technology within this topic is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR Parts 120-130, which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services, including export of sensitive technical data, or the Export Administration Regulation (EAR), 15 CFR Parts 730-774, which controls dual use items. Offerors must disclose any proposed use of foreign nationals (FNs), their country(ies) of origin, the type of visa or work permit possessed, and the statement of work (SOW) tasks intended for accomplishment by the FN(s) in accordance with the Announcement. Offerors are advised foreign nationals proposed to perform on this topic may be restricted due to the technical data under US Export Control Laws. 

OBJECTIVE: Develop a hardware capability that communicates rapidly between any commercial satellites to reduce latency of data transmission to track open ocean targets.

DESCRIPTION: The current model for commercial satellite communication involves each satellite independently communicating directly with ground stations or geostationary relay satellites. This architecture presents a significant challenge for tracking mobile targets, especially across wide areas. Because satellites do not communicate directly with each other, a target moving out of the field of view (FOV) of one satellite requires a time-consuming handoff process involving ground stations. This process introduces latency and inefficiencies, especially when trying to coordinate tracking across multiple satellites, whether from the same constellation or different vendors.

The use of existing commercial satellite infrastructure could provide the capability to mitigate these latencies and inefficiencies without the substantial cost of developing and deploying a dedicated military satellite network.

The Navy seeks a hardware solution to be installed on Government satellites that enables inter-satellite communication (ISC) within commercial satellite constellations. No existing commercial capability can accomplish this requirement. This proposed capability will allow satellites to directly share tracking data and other information and significantly improve the tracking of open ocean targets.

The solution must meet the following parameters:

1. Use Seamless Target Handoff to enable real-time communication between satellites, allowing for seamless tracking of objects as they move across the coverage areas of different satellites, eliminating the need for ground station intervention.

2. Use enhanced Tracking Accuracy and Persistence to direct communication between satellites.

3. Enable faster and more accurate correlation of target data from multiple viewpoints compared to the current time it takes to establish these same parameters.

4.Improve tracking accuracy, particularly for maneuvering targets.

5. Ensure persistent tracking even in challenging environments.

6. Establish an inter-satellite linked network that creates a dynamic and responsive network that adapts to changing operational needs.

7. Enable satellites to quickly share information about new targets or changes in target behavior, enhancing overall situational awareness.

8. Allow direct communication between satellites to reduce the time currently required to transmit critical tracking data to decision-makers.

9. Measure the data transfer latency between satellites under various network load and orbital configurations, as compared to latency experienced with traditional ground-relay communication systems.

10. Evaluate the data throughput capacity of the inter-satellite links and provide a determination of the maximum data rate that can be reliably sustained between satellites.

11. Assess the stability and reliability of the inter-satellite links under operational conditions for distances between satellites and atmospheric interference.

12. Test the effectiveness of routing data efficiently between satellites and route the data according to the most efficient routing protocol to achieve the most efficient routing between satellites, thus managing network congestion.

13. Improve target tracking accuracy achieved by using ISC compared to the accuracy using traditional methods with improved accuracy over the traditional methods. (Note: A baseline of traditional methods will be established to measure against an improvement provided by the solution, which must include the ability to measure the latency and message fidelity efficiency and seamlessness of target handoff between satellites including any associated loss of tracking data.)

14. Provide for assessing the coverage area of interest (AOI) footprint within the satellite pass and provide a determination of the ability of the network to maintain continuous tracking of targets moving across large areas.

15. Capable of simultaneously tracking multiple targets in accordance with the Commander’s intent, including targets with varying speeds and trajectories.

Work produced in Phase II may become classified. Note: The prospective contractor(s) must be U.S. owned and operated with no foreign influence as defined by 32 U.S.C. § 2004.20 et seq., National Industrial Security Program Executive Agent and Operating Manual, unless acceptable mitigating procedures can and have been implemented and approved by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) formerly Defense Security Service (DSS). The selected contractor must be able to acquire and maintain a secret level facility and Personnel Security Clearances. This will allow contractor personnel to perform on advanced phases of this project as set forth by DCSA and NAVSEA in order to gain access to classified information pertaining to the national defense of the United States and its allies; this will be an inherent requirement. The selected company will be required to safeguard classified material during the advanced phases of this contract IAW the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), which can be found at Title 32, Part 2004.20 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

PHASE I: Develop a concept for an intra-satellite communication hardware capability. Demonstrate feasibility through modeling and simulation showing the parameters in the Description can be achieved. Compare the cost of implementing and operating the intra-satellite communication system to the cost of alternative solutions, such as reliance solely on ground-based tracking systems. Assess the return on investment (ROI) achieved by leveraging commercial satellite infrastructure and implementing intra-satellite communication. The Phase I Option, if exercised, will include the initial design specifications and capabilities to build a prototype solution in Phase II.

PHASE II: Develop a prototype intra-satellite communication hardware capability based on the results of Phase I. Demonstrate that the prototype meets the parameters in the Description and the performance goals of Navy requirements. Support the Navy’s comprehensive testing to validate the effectiveness of the system using evaluation metrics to quantify the system’s performance. Deliver the prototype to the Navy.

It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II (see the Description for details).

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Support the Navy in transitioning the technology for use in a wartime environment to track objects of interest. Assist the Navy in testing the technology’s performance in actual conditions, which must be validated by demonstrating that the system meets the demanding requirements of modern naval operations via system integration and interoperability via operational testing in simulated scenarios and field testing.

Once operations of the system have provided feedback on its usability, effectiveness, and suitability for operational needs, the system will be used to inform future development and deployment decisions, ultimately providing concrete evidence of the system's capabilities and its potential to transform naval operations.

Outside the military, this technology has the potential to revolutionize various sectors, such as law enforcement, marine wildlife protection, vessel collision avoidance, supply chain management, coordination of rescue/relief efforts, and meteorology and space. The system could be deployed across multiple domains, improving safety, efficiency, and environmental protection in diverse environments.

REFERENCES:

  1. Wang, Lixiang; Ye, Dong; Kong, Xianren and Xiao, Yan. "Adaptive multi-segment pseudospectral sequential convex programming for satellite cluster reconfiguration trajectory optimization." Advances in Space Research, Volume 75, Issue 8, 15 April 2025, pp. 6317-6341.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.01.072

  3. Bakhsh, Zohre Mashayekh; Omid, Yasaman; Chen, Gaojie; Kayhan, Farbod; Ma, Yi and Tafazolli, Rahim. "Multi-Satellite MIMO Systems for Direct User-Satellite Communications: A Survey." arXiv preprint. June 2024, Cornell University, June 2024. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. X, No. X, XXX. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00196
  4. National Industrial Security Program Executive Agent and Operating Manual (NISP), 32 U.S.C. § 2004.20 et seq. (1993). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-32/subtitle-B/chapter-XX/part-2004

KEYWORDS: Data transfer latency; inter-satellite links; Tracking Accuracy and Persistence; geostationary relay satellites; data throughput capacity; target tracking accuracy; inter-satellite communications; ISC; intra-satellite communication

TPOC 1: Lauren Jones
(202) 781-0451
[email protected]

TPOC 2: Art Whittaker
(202) 781-2111
[email protected]

** TOPIC NOTICE **

The Navy Topic above is an "unofficial" copy from the Navy Topics in the DoW FY-26 Release 3 SBIR BAA. Please see the official DoW Topic website at www.dodsbirsttr.mil/submissions/solicitation-documents/active-solicitations for any updates.

The DoW issued its Navy FY-26 Release 3 SBIR Topics pre-release on June 3, 2026 which opens to receive proposals on June 24, 2026, and closes July 22, 2026 (12:00pm ET).

Direct Contact with Topic Authors: During the pre-release period (June 3, through June 23, 2026) proposing firms have an opportunity to directly contact the Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) to ask technical questions about the specific BAA topic. The TPOC contact information is listed in each topic description. Once DoW begins accepting proposals on June 24, 2026 no further direct contact between proposers and topic authors is allowed unless the Topic Author is responding to a question submitted during the Pre-release period.

DoD On-line Q&A System: After the pre-release period, until July 8, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET, proposers may submit written questions through the DoW On-line Topic Q&A at https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/submissions/login/ by logging in and following instructions. In the Topic Q&A system, the questioner and respondent remain anonymous but all questions and answers are posted for general viewing.
NOTE: You must have registered in the DSIP system in order to ask an on-line topic question.

DoW Topics Search Tool: Visit the DoW Topic Search Tool at www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/ to find topics by keyword across all DoW Components participating in this BAA.

Help: If you have general questions about the DoD SBIR program, please contact the DoD SBIR Help Desk via email at [email protected]


[ Top  -  Return ]